The IRISC2011 workshop is now only a month away. We urge all those who are thinking of coming to register as soon as possible.
The registration deadline September 5th, but the special hotel rates expire this coming Monday Aug 15th (see ‘Travel and Accommodation’ on the event details page).
A paper outlining challenges & potential solutions in contribution tracking and research assessment, with a focus on systematics and diversity studies. See also editorial in same issue and a blog post by one of the authors:
We have also just launched a new IRISC 2011 registration site, hosted by Eventbrite. Head over there to get tickets for this exciting event.
NB There is a limited pool of funds available for contributing towards participants’ travel and accommodation costs. Support is available to students, junior faculty and others with limited access to travel funds. Please contact us you wish to be considered for travel support.
It is time for this Special Interest Group to wake from a slumber of the last several months and get active again. The occasion? Along with our collaborators at CSC in Finland, we (GEN2PHEN) are now well underway with organizing a follow-up of the IRBW2009 workshop. This event, also in a workshop format, is titled Identity in Research Infrastructure and Scientific Communication:
We are really excited about this event, especially with the speakers we have lined up already (and several others who have express an interest in coming but not confirmed):
Martin Fenner, Hanover Medical School / ORCID Board of Directors
Hal Warren, APA / OpenID Society / Open Identity Exchange
Provisional agenda and workshop description are available on the main website: http://irisc-workshop.org
Twitter users and other social networkers will also find the Lanyrd social conference directory useful: http://lanyrd.com/2011/irisc/
In coming weeks and months we will be posting updates on this event, as the programme, speakers and other details get firmed up. In the meantime, registration is open.
[..]The idea is to construct a quantitative parameter to describe the use of bioresources, modeled on the publication ‘Impact Factor’. Such a BRIF would make it possible to document; 1. the quantitative use of a Bio-Resource, 2. the quality and the importance of research results involving it, and 3. the scientific and management efforts of those who set up and made available a valid bioresource and their institution.[..]
Clearly, researcher identity will play a key role in this work for identifying contributors (as discussed previously on this site).
Gabrielle Bertier has added posted several interesting topics and questions to the group for discussion, e.g. which type of persistent identifer that would be suitable and the issue of standardizing citations of bio-resources in the literature.
Sommer, J. The delay in sharing research data is costing lives. Nat Med (2010) vol. 16 (7) pp. 744. doi:10.1038/nm0710-744
It is not uncommon for potentially life-saving research data to be published years after being generated. But the setback to progress caused by the delay in releasing data is troublesome for people who selflessly participate in trials and desperately await new therapies. Scientists need to feel greater urgency to share their findings quickly, and they need additional avenues to facilitate this process.
G2P Knowledge Centre is part of GEN2PHEN and funded by the Health Thematic Area of the Cooperation Programme of the European Commission
within the VII Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development.